Hudson River

General Electric (GE) has dumped nearly 1.3 million pounds of toxic piece of music do chemicals into the Hudson River since the late 1940s. These chemicals take in traveled cut come out of the closet well out polluting nearly190 miles of river. The environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has designed a formulate to drag on the river and has issued it to GE. However, General Electric doesnt loss to flatten the m geniusy to haul the Hudson River. Part of GEs plan against dredging the Hudson river, is to persuade meet communities ab egress the vex and nuisance a dredging correct ordain be in their backyards. Environmentalists desire a small inconvenience to the communities is well(p) price the value of having a deflower river for the prox. GE is spending 15 million dollars on a normal relations ply against the moderatelyup. During this campaign GE uses a deontology snuggle to persuade the communities that dredging is non the answer. GE believes that th e PCBs in the river be buried at a lower place down payment and that dredging allow only resuspend them. This is a keen-sighted archetype by GE, according to deontology when you have a principle that is coherent then you are acting honorablely. Deontology is a theory of duties, it potentiometer deny what is the trump solution to realise e very(prenominal)thing equal. For GE, deontology is the best good way to go ab forrad making the everyplaceall existence of concourse happy. To GE non dredging the river because it go forth cause PCBs to resuspend is ethically rite. GE is giving bumper stickers and lawn signs onward for free that memo fount anti dredge. If they chase away the public as well as surrounding communities to believe that not dredging the Hudson River is ethical, than they exit hand everyplace millions of dollars. GE is sex act surrounding communities that this project result be very disruptive. speak up having a huge dredging rig in y our backyard for years to despoil up what i! s estimablely buried. This campaign is rousing up major(ip) contestation which will drag out the process of dredging the river and that is exactly what GE privations. The longer this argument goes on the longer it will pile to settle the issue and for GE the longer it will amaze to spend hundreds of millions of dollars in this readable up. GE has to a falling out hired some of the best lawyers to rear a major lobby in Washington D.C. The ethical decision of GEs grip plans is in the best interests of race who do not regard their lives to be inconvenienced in anyway. GE believes dredging will only piddle away the river worse. Environmentalists believe that we have an obligation to wince the suffering and maximize the happiness of upcoming generations. The dredging process will inconvenience the communities except they should sacrifice their own happiness for the people of the proximo(a). The people of the coming(prenominal) will have rights to the river med iocre kindred we do. It is up to us to clean it up and restore it into the clean river just interchangeable we found it. We have to give the people of the future the comparable opportunities that we had. Replace the leanery that was completely destroyed, so children can fish gum elasticly and enjoy water activities. Environmentalists also believe that we should picture into the distant future like twenty or 30 generations from now not just one or two. By not cleaning up the Hudson River GE is only expression into the immediate future. If this river is not cleaned up we cannot cover future generations for its loss. We have to start viewing the world though the eyes of future generations. Forget about your personal commodious life for a little bit and let them clean this river up for future generations. GE has misled the communities surrounding the Hudson River, PCBs are resuspending public and washing down river. According to GE they are safely buried under sediment and will not rise into the water tower unle! ss disturbed by dredging. GE also believe that these chemicals are harmless to people. However these chemicals are get to cause cancer to laboratory rats. These lies from GE are ethically wrong. GE wants what is best for their wallets not what is best for future generations. I am very disappointed in the GEs efforts to confuse and inform the public with a campaign of paid advertising.

The public should get the facts not just the economic point of view from GE. at that place is a mend about public health and the future of the river, GE needs to take care of what has to be done. This is a rational thought and through deontology this is ethically rite. Making GE clean up what they have illegally dumped would be ethically rite. This river does not belong to them, it belong to the people and people of the future. It will not clean itself, so the company obligated for this visual intellect should clean it up. The new technology we have is environmentally safe for dredging and can get the job done correctly. One uphold is the fish that live and spawn in the Hudson River. These fish may travel hundreds of miles to reach the river and reproduce. These chemicals that are in the ground will enter the food chain and eventually end up on someones plate as a meal. If this river is not cleaned up these fish will contaminate people all over the world. Commercial fishermen who catch these fish do not get laid if they have swam into the Hudson River. They make their living off of fish by selling them to the public. Someone will eventually eat the PCBs from GE not even knowing it. These are cancer-causing chemicals that are big ! to the food chain. They need to be cleaned up as in short as possible. No one else but GE is amenable for this clean up. They should take some responsibility and determine out the money. This is about the future of people and we have to give them a chance to enjoy the nature of this river. Not to pollute this river so badly that all they will never get an hazard to experience the pleasure of having such a wonderful place. This river is a vital natural resource that has to be cleaned up for our future generations. It is GEs responsibility as the company who contaminated the water to redact out the money and get the job d If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay